DeMocker v. Associated Gas & Electric Co.
240 A.D. 946
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1933·Published
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum. Despite plaintiffs’ allegation that they have no adequate remedy at law, we find a sufficient statement of two law actions,, one for the recovery of purchase money after an alleged rescission of a contract of sale and another for money damages in an action for deceit. The demand for equitable as well as legal relief does not require a dismissal of the complaint. (Saperstein v. Mechanics & Farmers Sav. Bank, 228 N. Y. 257, 261, 262.) All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DeMocker v. Associated Gas & Electric Co., 240 A.D. 946 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
240 A.D. 946 (DeMocker v. Associated Gas & Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Saperstein v. Mechanics & Farmers Savings Bank
126 N.E. 708 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)