Demmo v. Demmo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Demmo v. Demmo

294 A.D.2d 362, 741 N.Y.S.2d 719, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4810

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 294 A.D.2d 362 (Demmo v. Demmo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Demmo v. Demmo, 294 A.D.2d 362, 741 N.Y.S.2d 719, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 and Domestic Relations Law § 72, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (DePhillips, J.), dated September 15, 2000, which denied her petition and dismissed the proceeding seeking visitation with her grandson.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances, the Family Court properly dismissed the proceeding. The petitioner grandmother failed to show sufficient evidence of a change of circumstances since the last fact-finding hearing on February 15, 2000, when the Family Court determined that it was in the best interest of the child to suspend and terminate the petitioner’s visitation (see Matter of Coutsoukis v Samora, 274 AD2d 518; Matter of King v King, 266 AD2d 546). Ritter, J.P., Smith, Luciano and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 and Domestic Relations Law § 72, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (DePhillips, J.), dated September 15, 2000, which denied her petition and dismissed the proceeding seeking visitation with her grandson.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances, the Family Court properly dismissed the proceeding. The petitioner grandmother failed to show sufficient evidence of a change of circumstances since the last fact-finding hearing on February 15, 2000, when the Family Court determined that it was in the best interest of the child to suspend and terminate the petitioner’s visitation (see Matter of Coutsoukis v Samora, 274 AD2d 518; Matter of King v King, 266 AD2d 546). Ritter, J.P., Smith, Luciano and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 A.D.2d 362, 741 N.Y.S.2d 719, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demmo-v-demmo-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack