Demitry v. Fauquier County Government

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedAugust 1, 2018
DocketCivil Action No. 2018-1177
StatusPublished

This text of Demitry v. Fauquier County Government (Demitry v. Fauquier County Government) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Demitry v. Fauquier County Government, (D.D.C. 2018).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CHRISTOPHER DEMITRY,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 18-1177 (DLF) FAUQUIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT, et al.,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In his complaint, the plaintiff Christopher Demitry asserts several grievances against four

defendants: Fauquier County Government, Service First Management and Consulting, Inc.,

Snow Hill Homeowner’s Association, Inc., and Virginia Department of Transportation. Before

the Court are defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint. See Dkt. 3; Dkt. 4; Dkt. 5; Dkt. 7.

All four defendants argue, among other things, that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to

address Demitry’s claims. In response to the defendants’ motions, Demitry asks the Court to

dismiss the case without barring the resubmission of his claims to the appropriate venue. See

Dkt. 9; Dkt. 10; Dkt. 11; Dkt. 12. Under Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a

plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss an action “before the opposing party serves either an answer or

a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); see also Mitchell v. United

States Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 293 F. Supp. 3d 209, 213 (D.D.C. 2018) (citations omitted)

(“[V]oluntary dismissal is available where the defendant files a Rule 12(b) motion that does not

rely on materials outside the pleadings.”). That voluntary dismissal is without prejudice unless

the plaintiff’s notice of dismissal specifies otherwise. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B). Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1), this case is dismissed without prejudice. The

defendants’ pending motions to dismiss are denied as moot. The Clerk of Court shall close this

case. A separate order consistent with this decision accompanies this memorandum opinion.

________________________ DABNEY L. FRIEDRICH Uited States District Judge Date: August 1, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitchell v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n
293 F. Supp. 3d 209 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Demitry v. Fauquier County Government, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demitry-v-fauquier-county-government-dcd-2018.