Demissie v. Ford

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedJuly 30, 2025
Docket2:25-cv-00504
StatusUnknown

This text of Demissie v. Ford (Demissie v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Demissie v. Ford, (D. Nev. 2025).

Opinion

1 ROBERT W. FREEMAN Nevada Bar No. 3062 2 Robert.Freeman@lewisbrisbois.com E.MATTHEW FREEMAN 3 Nevada Bar No. 14198 Matt.Freeman@lewisbrisbois.com 4 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600 5 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 702.893.3383 6 FAX: 702.893.3789 Attorneys for Defendants 7 Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Officer Brooks West and Detective Gabriel Lea 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA, SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 *** 12 DANIEL DEMISSIE; CASE NO. 2:25-cv-00504-JAD-EJY 13 Plaintiff, AMENDED STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND 14 vs. PROTECTIVE ORDER 15 AARON D. FORD, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS 16 METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT (Metro), DETECTIVE GABRIEL LEA 17 (#16511), OFFICER BROOKS WEST (#16134), CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, 18 INC., FLAMINGO LAS VEGAS OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, AND JOHN 19 DOE, FLAMINGO ASSISTANT SECURITY SHIFT MANAGER, 20 Defendants. 21 22 The parties to this action, by their respective counsel or appearing pro se, having agreed to 23 the following, and for good cause shown pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 26(c)(1), IT IS HEREBY 24 ORDERED as follows: 25 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS. 26 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action may involve production of confidential, 27 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure may be 1 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 2 discovery and that the protection it affords extends only to the limited information or items that 3 are entitled under law to treatment as confidential. 4 2. SCOPE. 5 All documents produced in the course of discovery, all responses to discovery requests, 6 and all deposition testimony and exhibits and any other materials which may be subject to 7 discovery (hereinafter collectively “Discovery Material”) shall be subject to this stipulated 8 protective order concerning confidential information as set forth below. Any party, including pro 9 se litigants, or any third party who produces documents in this litigation, may designate 10 documents as Confidential but only after review of the documents by a legal representative of a 11 party and/or the pro se litigant representing themselves who has, in good faith, determined that the 12 documents contain “Confidential Information,” as defined below, and pursuant to the procedure 13 set forth below. 14 3. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. 15 “Confidential Information” shall mean information meriting special protection under the 16 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and applicable case law. Confidential Information does not 17 include information that: (a) is in the public domain at the time of disclosure; (b) becomes part of 18 the public domain through no fault of the Receiving Party; (c) the Receiving Party can show was 19 in its rightful and lawful possession at the time of disclosure; or (d) the Receiving Party lawfully 20 receives from a Non-party later without restriction as to disclosure. “Confidential information” 21 also refers to information and/or items (regardless of how they are generated, stored or 22 maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection, the process for which is delineated 23 herein, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(c). 24 4. OTHER DEFINITIONS RELEVANT TO THE INSTANT PROTECTIVE 25 ORDER AND CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT 26 Party: any party to this action, including any party appearing pro se, and all of its officers, 27 directors, agents, and attorney(s) of record for a Party in this action (including their associates, 1 litigant to assist with this litigation). 2 Non-party: any individual, corporation, association, or natural person or entity other than a 3 party. 4 Protected Material: any Discovery Material containing Confidential Information that is 5 designated by a Party or Non-party as “CONFIDENTIAL,” unless the Receiving Party challenges 6 the confidentiality designation and (a) the Court decides such material is not entitled to protection 7 as confidential; (b) the Designating Party fails to apply the Court for an order designating the 8 material confidential within the time period specified below; or (c) the Designating Party 9 withdraws its confidentiality designation in writing. 10 Producing Party: a Party or Non-party that produces Discovery Material in this action. 11 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 12 Designating Party: a Party or Non-party that designates Discovery Material as 13 “CONFIDENTIAL”. The Party or Non-party designating information or items as Protected 14 Material bears the burden of establishing good cause for the confidentiality of all such items. 15 Challenging Party: a party that elects to initiate a challenge to a Designating Party’s 16 confidentiality designation. 17 5. FORM AND TIMING OF DESIGNATION. 18 Protected Material shall be so designated by the Producing Party by placing or affixing the 19 word “CONFIDENTIAL” on the document in a manner which will not interfere with the legibility 20 of the document and which will permit complete removal of the “Confidential” designation. 21 Documents shall be designated “Confidential” prior to, or contemporaneously with, the production 22 or disclosure of the documents. 23 A Designating Party must exercise restraint and make good faith efforts to limit 24 CONFIDENTIAL designations to specific materials that qualify for protection under the 25 appropriate standard. Further, a Designating Party must use good faith efforts to designate for 26 protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or communications that qualify – so that 27 other portions of the materials, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not 1 of materials on a page or within a document merit protection, a Producing Party must so indicate 2 by making appropriate markings in the margins but not over text. 3 A Producing Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection 4 need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which material 5 it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all of the 6 material made available for inspection shall be deemed “Confidential.” After the inspecting Party 7 has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine 8 which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order, and, before 9 producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend on each 10 page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 11 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 12 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriated markings in the margins or by redacting protected 13 portions). 14 Portions of depositions shall be designated Confidential when the deposition is taken or 15 within fourteen (14) business days after receipt of the transcript, if feasible. Such designation shall 16 be specific as to the portions to be protected. A Designating Party must exercise restraint and 17 make good faith efforts to limit “CONFIDENTIAL” designations to specific materials that qualify 18 for protection under the appropriate standards. 19 Inadvertent or unintentional production of Protected Material without prior designation as 20 “Confidential” shall not be deemed a waiver, in whole or in part, of the right to designate 21 documents as Protected Material as otherwise allowed by this Order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
FCA U.S. LLC v. Ctr. for Auto Safety
137 S. Ct. 38 (Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Demissie v. Ford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demissie-v-ford-nvd-2025.