D'Emidio v. Williamsbridge Restaurant Inc.

136 A.D.3d 406, 23 N.Y.S.3d 877
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 2, 2016·No. 74 24097/13·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti-Hughes, J.), entered July 16, 2014, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the class action complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion was properly denied. The allegations in the complaint sufficiently set forth factual allegations to arguably establish the class action prerequisites set forth in CPLR 901 and 902, at least to survive this dismissal motion (see Bernstein v Kelso & Co., 231 AD2d 314, 323-324 [1st Dept 1997]; Ackerman v New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Queens, 127 AD3d 794, 796 [2d Dept 2015]).

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, ManzanetDaniels and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D'Emidio v. Williamsbridge Restaurant Inc., 136 A.D.3d 406, 23 N.Y.S.3d 877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

136 A.D.3d 406 (D'Emidio v. Williamsbridge Restaurant Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pacheco v. Catholic Guardian Servs.
2025 NY Slip Op 31098(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)