Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Demetrius v. State

Demetrius v. State

864 So. 2d 1208, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 433, 2004 WL 86297
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 21, 2004
DocketNo. 4D03-4938
StatusPublished

This text of 864 So. 2d 1208 (Demetrius v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Demetrius v. State, 864 So. 2d 1208, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 433, 2004 WL 86297 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order that denied his motion for additional jail credit. We affirm because the motion contained a defective verification clause. See Greenwood v. State, 802 So.2d 401, 401-02 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant filing a motion with the proper oath as set forth in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.987. Thereafter, the trial court can consider the coer-civeness and restrictiveness of appellant’s prior detention. See Smith v. State, 849 So.2d 409, 409 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

WARNER, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
849 So. 2d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Greenwood v. State
802 So. 2d 401 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
864 So. 2d 1208, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 433, 2004 WL 86297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demetrius-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.