Demetrius Tyrone Wicker v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Demetrius Tyrone Wicker v. State

DecidedMarch 14, 2022

DocketA22D0265

StatusPublished

This text of Demetrius Tyrone Wicker v. State (Demetrius Tyrone Wicker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Demetrius Tyrone Wicker v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ March 14, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22D0265. DEMETRIUS TYRONE WICKER v. THE STATE.

Demetrius Tyrone Wicker was convicted of burglary in the first degree, battery, and criminal trespass, and this Court affirmed his convictions in an unpublished opinion. See Wicker v. State, Case No. A19A1876 (Jan. 7, 2020). In December 2021, Wicker filed multiple pro se motions, seeking various forms of relief. The trial court denied his motions, and Wicker filed the instant application for discretionary appeal, arguing that his convictions are void because his indictment should have been returned in open court. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Wicker’s argument that his indictment was not returned in open court is an attack on his convictions. See Thompson v. State, 304 Ga. 146, 149 (3) (816 SE2d 646) (2018) (“Appellant claims that his convictions are void because the record does not show that his indictment was returned in open court.”); Jones v. State, 290 Ga. App. 490, 494 (2) (659 SE2d 875) (2008) (holding that challenges to the indictment “are essentially attempts to vacate a judgment of conviction”). A post-conviction motion seeking to vacate an allegedly void conviction is not a valid procedure in a criminal case, and any appeal from the denial or dismissal of such a motion must be dismissed. See Williams v. State, 287 Ga. 192, 194 (695 SE2d 244) (2010); Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010). Because Wicker is not authorized to collaterally attack his convictions in this manner, this application is hereby DISMISSED. See Roberts, 286 Ga. at 532; Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (2) (686 SE2d 786) (2009).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 03/14/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ March 14, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22D0265. DEMETRIUS TYRONE WICKER v. THE STATE.

Demetrius Tyrone Wicker was convicted of burglary in the first degree, battery, and criminal trespass, and this Court affirmed his convictions in an unpublished opinion. See Wicker v. State, Case No. A19A1876 (Jan. 7, 2020). In December 2021, Wicker filed multiple pro se motions, seeking various forms of relief. The trial court denied his motions, and Wicker filed the instant application for discretionary appeal, arguing that his convictions are void because his indictment should have been returned in open court. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Wicker’s argument that his indictment was not returned in open court is an attack on his convictions. See Thompson v. State, 304 Ga. 146, 149 (3) (816 SE2d 646) (2018) (“Appellant claims that his convictions are void because the record does not show that his indictment was returned in open court.”); Jones v. State, 290 Ga. App. 490, 494 (2) (659 SE2d 875) (2008) (holding that challenges to the indictment “are essentially attempts to vacate a judgment of conviction”). A post-conviction motion seeking to vacate an allegedly void conviction is not a valid procedure in a criminal case, and any appeal from the denial or dismissal of such a motion must be dismissed. See Williams v. State, 287 Ga. 192, 194 (695 SE2d 244) (2010); Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010). Because Wicker is not authorized to collaterally attack his convictions in this manner, this application is hereby DISMISSED. See Roberts, 286 Ga. at 532; Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (2) (686 SE2d 786) (2009).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 03/14/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Demetrius Tyrone Wicker v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demetrius-tyrone-wicker-v-state-gactapp-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack