Demesmin v. State
762 So. 2d 1035, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9420, 2000 WL 1022295
Opinion
We reverse the order denying Fitolay Demesmin’s motion to correct illegal sentence. The state agrees that his offenses were committed within the window period during which the 1995 amendments to the sentencing guidelines were unconstitutional. Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla.2000). On remand, the trial court shall determine whether resentencing is required. See, Speed v. State, — So.2d - 2000 WL 873307 (Fla. 4th DCA July 5, 2000); Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Demesmin v. State, 762 So. 2d 1035, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9420, 2000 WL 1022295 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
762 So. 2d 1035 (Demesmin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Trapp v. State
760 So. 2d 924 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Smith v. State
761 So. 2d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)