Demers v. Scaramella

252 Mass. 430
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided May 21, 1925·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Rugg, C.J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Western District, reversing a ruling of a judge of the District Court of Springfield and directing a new trial of the whole case. The case is here prematurely. Appeal does not lie immediately to this court from such an order. It is not a final decision. The new trial must be had. Real Property Co. Inc. v. Pitt, 230 Mass. 526. Matson v. Sbrega, 250 Mass. 138, and cases there collected. Beacon Tool & Machinery Co. v. National Products Manuf. Co., ante, 88. It may be added that the question which the parties have sought to argue is not fairly presented, because a ruling of law that a plaintiff can recover rarely can be made. Even facts found, unless including a statement of all inferences drawn, do not afford basis for such rulings.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Demers v. Scaramella, 252 Mass. 430 (Mass. 1925).

252 Mass. 430 (Demers v. Scaramella) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Orasz v. Colonial Tavern, Inc.
310 N.E.2d 311 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1974)
Acushnet Hospital Ass'n v. Town of Acushnet
63 N.E.2d 334 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1945)
Weiner v. Pictorial Paper Package Corp.
20 N.E.2d 458 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1939)
Gill v. Stretton
10 N.E.2d 185 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)
Hammond v. Boston Terminal Co.
4 N.E.2d 328 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1936)
Cunniff v. Cleaves
192 N.E. 830 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Hurwitz
187 N.E. 759 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Buchannan v. Meisner
181 N.E. 742 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1932)
Patterson v. Ciborowski
179 N.E. 161 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1931)