Demeritte v. School Board of Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Demeritte v. School Board of Dade County

420 So. 2d 945, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21512

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 26, 1982

DocketNo. 82-1457

StatusPublished

This text of 420 So. 2d 945 (Demeritte v. School Board of Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Demeritte v. School Board of Dade County, 420 So. 2d 945, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21512 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner seeks review of the respondent’s, School Board of Dade County, action in dismissing him as an employee, with a petition for review. The correct method to review such an order of dismissal is by appeal. See Rule 9.030(b), (c) Fla.R.App.P.

We consider the petition as a notice of appeal¹ and affirm.

[946]*946We have copies of applicable portions of the lower tribunal proceedings to enable us to determine that there was ample evidence to support the board’s finding that the relator should not continue in its employ and that there was no error in its order of dismissal. Shapiro v. State, 390 So.2d 344 (Fla.1980); Damiano v. Weinstein, 355 So.2d 819 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Florida Living For the Retired v. Koltnow, 143 So.2d 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962).

Therefore the order of dismissal is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner seeks review of the respondent’s, School Board of Dade County, action in dismissing him as an employee, with a petition for review. The correct method to review such an order of dismissal is by appeal. See Rule 9.030(b), (c) Fla.R.App.P.

We consider the petition as a notice of appeal¹ and affirm.

[946]*946We have copies of applicable portions of the lower tribunal proceedings to enable us to determine that there was ample evidence to support the board’s finding that the relator should not continue in its employ and that there was no error in its order of dismissal. Shapiro v. State, 390 So.2d 344 (Fla.1980); Damiano v. Weinstein, 355 So.2d 819 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Florida Living For the Retired v. Koltnow, 143 So.2d 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962).

Therefore the order of dismissal is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

420 So. 2d 945, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demeritte-v-school-board-of-dade-county-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack