Demerell v. Gerlinger
This text of 167 So. 750 (Demerell v. Gerlinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William J. Demerell sued his wife for a separation from bed and board on the ground of alleged cruel treatment. His wife filed a rule against him to show cause why he should not be condemned to pay her alimony pendente lite and an additional sum of $15 to defray costs of court.
He filed an exception of no right or cause of action and a plea to the jurisdiction of the court on the ground that his wife had instituted alimony proceedings against him in the juvenile court for the parish of Orleans.
The rule was tried on its merits and judgment was rendered in favor of the wife, granting her the sum of $40 per month alimony, subject to a credit of $5 per week, as long as that amount was paid by him as alimony in the juvenile court. He was further directed to deposit with the clerk of the civil district court the sum of $15 covering costs of court, and required to furnish a bond in the sum of $150, to guarantee the payment of any attorney’s fees that he might be condemned to pay.
Plaintiff appealed.
It appears that the case was regularly set for hearing in this court and plaintiff failed to file a brief or to have his counsel present oral argument.
The exception of no right or cause of action is clearly without merit and it is therefore overruled.
The exception to the jurisdiction of the court is not well founded, the Constitution (art. 7, § 35) clearly providing that the *849 civil district court has jurisdiction of separation from bed and board cases and rules for alimony pendente lite, which are incidental demands.
The record shows that the plaintiff is regularly employed, earning $42.50 per week, or approximately $170 per month; he pays $8 per week for his meals and, $1.50 a week for laundry. It was also shown that the wife had no income. There was no issue born of the marriage and it does not appear that the plaintiff has any other dependents. The sum of $40 per month for alimony pendente lite for the wife is therefore reasonable.
For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 So. 750, 184 La. 847, 1936 La. LEXIS 1119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demerell-v-gerlinger-la-1936.