Demens v. Poyntz

6 So. 261, 25 Fla. 654
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 15, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 6 So. 261 (Demens v. Poyntz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Demens v. Poyntz, 6 So. 261, 25 Fla. 654 (Fla. 1889).

Opinion

Raney. C. J.:

Appellee moved to dismiss the appeal because it was taken without notice or citation.

We do not say whether or not the stipulation filed in this court and assigned by counsel for the respective parties, covers the absence of a citation and service thereof, but there is a defect which makes the appeal premature, and which we would take notice of had we opened the record to dispose of the cause on its merits.

The cause was tried by a referee. Iiis decision,” as it is styled by him, is, after giving the style of the cause, as follows: “I find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at eight hundred and nine dollars and eighty-eight cents, ($889.88.) Aug. 3, 1888.” This is not a final judgment, it is simply the referee’s finding. The statute, McClellan’s Digest, á and 5, contemplates both findings and a judgment in cases at law, and findings and decree in cases in equity. The term decision is used in the statute at least once as convertible with that of findings.

This case is at law, and the meaning of the statute is, that there shall be a formal final judgment by the referee,, following the form of judgments at law as far as applicable. Until there has been such a judgment, there can be no appeal. The appeal is from the judgment or decree, not from the findings. Section 9, p. 858 McC.’s Digest.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Milton v. Danford
130 So. 435 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Ellis v. State
129 So. 106 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Maroney v. Tannehill
1923 OK 799 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Jones v. Tyler
58 Fla. 290 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 So. 261, 25 Fla. 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demens-v-poyntz-fla-1889.