DeMendoza v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of the Palm Beaches

585 So. 2d 453, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8478, 1991 WL 167850
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 4, 1991
DocketNo. 91-0389
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 585 So. 2d 453 (DeMendoza v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of the Palm Beaches) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DeMendoza v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of the Palm Beaches, 585 So. 2d 453, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8478, 1991 WL 167850 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee, First Federal Savings and Loan Association of The Palm Beaches (First [454]*454Federal), as the plantiff in a mortgage foreclosure action, on October 29, 1990, filed a motion for summary judgment and scheduled a hearing thereon for December 4, 1990. A supplemental affidavit to add $616 in taxes was filed by First Federal on November 27,1990, and the summary judgment hearing was rescheduled for December 12, 1990. Counsel for both parties were present and the matter was heard by the trial court and final judgment entered December 12, 1990. Sale was had and certificate of title issued.

On January 22, 1991, appellant moved to vacate the judgment pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b). As grounds therefor appellant stated: “The introduction of the supplemental affidavit gave rise to an error of fact and may be vacated under Rule 1.540(b) mistake[,] inadvertence.”

It is apparent from the scant record and briefs presented that, if a mistake was made, it was appellants’ failure to object on the grounds that the full twenty days required by the rule had not been allowed. Not having called this deficiency, if any, to the trial court’s attention, it was waived. Furthermore, we doubt the applicability of rule 1.540(b) in the context of this case.

Accordingly, the order appealed from is affirmed.

DOWNEY, LETTS and STONE, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vereen v. Vereen
617 So. 2d 1151 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Rolfs v. First Union National Bank of Florida
604 So. 2d 1269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
585 So. 2d 453, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8478, 1991 WL 167850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demendoza-v-first-federal-savings-loan-assn-of-the-palm-beaches-fladistctapp-1991.