Dembrowski v. Dembrowski

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dembrowski v. Dembrowski

580 So. 2d 897, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5877, 1991 WL 104659

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 19, 1991

DocketNo. 90-2863

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 580 So. 2d 897 (Dembrowski v. Dembrowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dembrowski v. Dembrowski, 580 So. 2d 897, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5877, 1991 WL 104659 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and vacate the trial court’s order confirming the general master’s report. Appellee concedes that the trial court entered the order within the ten (10) day period Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.490(h) allowed for filing exceptions to the general master’s report and that appellant should be permitted to file exceptions consistent with the rule.

Appellant did not raise the issues presented in his remaining points on appeal before the general master and the trial court did not resolve them. As a result, we will not consider them for the first time on appeal. See Hurley v. Slingerland, 461 So.2d 282, 284 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand the cause to the trial court with instructions to conduct further proceedings consistent with Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.490(h).

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI