Demba v. Zerjav

Missouri Court of Appeals

Demba v. Zerjav

796 S.W.2d 50, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1233, 1990 WL 116056

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 14, 1990·No. No. 57369·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals, in a court-tried case, from a judgment for plaintiff in a suit on account for appraisal services rendered. We affirm. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals, in a court-tried case, from a judgment for plaintiff in a suit on account for appraisal services rendered. We affirm. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Demba v. Zerjav, 796 S.W.2d 50, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1233, 1990 WL 116056 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

796 S.W.2d 50 (Demba v. Zerjav) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.