Demarsenese Cage v. the Methodist Hospital

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Demarsenese Cage v. the Methodist Hospital. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 7089
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 25, 2014·No. 01-14-00341-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-14-00341-CV Style: Demarsenese Cage v The Methodist Hospital Date motion filed*: September 19, 2014 Type of motion: Motion to extend time to file the brief Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant’s brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: September 15, 2014 Number of prior extensions: 0 Current Due date: September 15, 2014 Date Requested: N/A

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellant moves the Court to “accept as filed the brief that Appellant prematurely filed on July 7, 2014.” We grant the motion. We further order that appellee’s brief, if any, be filed no later than 30 days from the date of this order.

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack  Acting individually

Date: September 25, 2014

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Demarsenese Cage v. the Methodist Hospital, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Demarsenese Cage v. the Methodist Hospital (Demarsenese Cage v. the Methodist Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.