Demarion Trammel v. A. Ramos, et al.

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEMARION TRAMMEL, No. 2:23-cv-1111 KJM AC P 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 A. RAMOS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On August 14, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 25 recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to 26 keep the court apprised of his current address at all times.1 Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service 27 1 The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s website indicates that plaintiff is 28 (continued) 1 of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 2 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 3 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 4 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 5 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 6 . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 7 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 8 The court orders the following: 9 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 59) are adopted in full; 10 2. Defendants’ motion to stay (ECF No. 43) is denied; 11 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to update plaintiff’s address for service to Salinas 12 Valley State Prison, P.O. Box 1050, Soledad, CA 93960; 13 4. All pretrial motions, including motions for summary judgment, shall be filed on or 14 before October 15, 2025; and 15 5. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 16 proceedings. 17 This order resolves ECF Nos. 43, 59. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 DATED: September 11, 2025. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

27 currently incarcerated at Salinas Valley State Prison. The Clerk of the Court will be directed to update the docket accordingly. Plaintiff is cautioned that his failure to update his address of 28 record may result in dismissal of this case for failure to prosecute.