Demarie Dian Reedy v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

D. Nebraska

Demarie Dian Reedy v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

DecidedJune 3, 2026

Docket4:24-cv-03099

StatusUnknown

This text of Demarie Dian Reedy v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (Demarie Dian Reedy v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Demarie Dian Reedy v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, (D. Neb. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

DEMARIE DIAN REEDY, 4:24CV3099 Plaintiff, vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Demarie Reedy’s motion for attorney fees in the amount of $7,576.39 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Filing No. 28. The Social Security Commissioner, Frank Bisignano, (“Commissioner”) does not object to the motion for attorney fees. Filing No. 30. The EAJA provides for attorney fees if: “(1) the person is a prevailing party; (2) the individual’s net worth did not exceed $2,000,000 at the time the civil action was filed; and (3) the fees and expenses were ‘incurred by the party in [the] civil action’ in which it prevailed.” U.S. S.E.C. v. Zahareas, 374 F.3d 624, 630 (8th Cir. 2004) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A)–(2)(B)). “The fees awarded must be reasonable.” 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A)(ii). A reasonable fee under § 2412 does not exceed “$125 per hour unless the court determines that an increase in cost of living or a special factor, such as limited availability of qualified attorneys for the proceedings involved, justifies a higher fee.” Id. For a successful Social Security claimant to collect attorney fees, the Commissioner’s position must lack substantial justification. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2412(d)(2)(A). Substantial justification occurs when the Commissioner’s position has a clearly reasonable basis in law and fact. Brouwers v. Bowen, 823 F.2d 273, 275 (8th Cir. 1987). The Commissioner bears the burden of proving that their position is substantially justified. Goad v. Barnhart, 398 F.3d 1021, 1025 (8th Cir. 2005). In this instance, the Court issued and Memorandum and Order reversing the Commissioner’s decision denying benefits to Plaintiff. Filing No. 26. In addition, the Commissioner does not object to Plaintiff’s EAJA motion. Filing No. 30.

The Court finds that Plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees under the EAJA. Plaintiff is the prevailing party. Additionally, Plaintiff’s net worth did not exceed $2,000,000 at the time of filing for this civil action. Filing No. 29 at 1. Plaintiff requests attorneys’ fees totaling $7,576.39 representing 29.2 attorney hours of work completed in 2024 at an adjusted hourly rate of $239.26 and $590 for 5.9 hours for paralegals at $100 per hour. Filing No. 29-2. Plaintiff argues the increase in hourly rates from the $125 baseline reflects an increase in the cost of living, as evidenced through the cost-of-living index changes. Filing No. 29-1 at 3. An increase for the cost of living is generally allowed. Johnson v. Sullivan, 919

F.2d 503, 508–10 (8th Cir. 1990). According to the Eighth Circuit, the United States Department of Labor's Consumer Price Index, “constitutes ‘proper proof’ of the increased cost of living since the EAJA's enactment. Id. at 504. The Court finds that the increase in cost of living justifies a fee higher than $125 per hour and that the rates Plaintiff requested are reasonable. The Court carefully reviewed the hours submitted and finds them reasonable in all aspects. Thus, the Court concludes that both the amount requested, and the hours expended, are reasonable. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2412(c). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees, Filing No. 28, is granted. 2. Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, attorney fees in the amount of $7,576.39 are to be paid directly to the plaintiff’s attorney, less any offset to satisfy a pre- existing debt to the United States. Such awards shall be paid by the Social Security Administration. 3. A separate judgment shall be entered in conjunction with this Memorandum and

Order. Dated this 3rd day of June, 2026. BY THE COURT:

s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Senior United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

DEMARIE DIAN REEDY, 4:24CV3099 Plaintiff, vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Demarie Reedy’s motion for attorney fees in the amount of $7,576.39 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Filing No. 28. The Social Security Commissioner, Frank Bisignano, (“Commissioner”) does not object to the motion for attorney fees. Filing No. 30. The EAJA provides for attorney fees if: “(1) the person is a prevailing party; (2) the individual’s net worth did not exceed $2,000,000 at the time the civil action was filed; and (3) the fees and expenses were ‘incurred by the party in [the] civil action’ in which it prevailed.” U.S. S.E.C. v. Zahareas, 374 F.3d 624, 630 (8th Cir. 2004) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A)–(2)(B)). “The fees awarded must be reasonable.” 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A)(ii). A reasonable fee under § 2412 does not exceed “$125 per hour unless the court determines that an increase in cost of living or a special factor, such as limited availability of qualified attorneys for the proceedings involved, justifies a higher fee.” Id. For a successful Social Security claimant to collect attorney fees, the Commissioner’s position must lack substantial justification. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2412(d)(2)(A). Substantial justification occurs when the Commissioner’s position has a clearly reasonable basis in law and fact. Brouwers v. Bowen, 823 F.2d 273, 275 (8th Cir. 1987). The Commissioner bears the burden of proving that their position is substantially justified. Goad v. Barnhart, 398 F.3d 1021, 1025 (8th Cir. 2005). In this instance, the Court issued and Memorandum and Order reversing the Commissioner’s decision denying benefits to Plaintiff. Filing No. 26. In addition, the Commissioner does not object to Plaintiff’s EAJA motion. Filing No. 30.

The Court finds that Plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees under the EAJA. Plaintiff is the prevailing party. Additionally, Plaintiff’s net worth did not exceed $2,000,000 at the time of filing for this civil action. Filing No. 29 at 1. Plaintiff requests attorneys’ fees totaling $7,576.39 representing 29.2 attorney hours of work completed in 2024 at an adjusted hourly rate of $239.26 and $590 for 5.9 hours for paralegals at $100 per hour. Filing No. 29-2. Plaintiff argues the increase in hourly rates from the $125 baseline reflects an increase in the cost of living, as evidenced through the cost-of-living index changes. Filing No. 29-1 at 3. An increase for the cost of living is generally allowed. Johnson v. Sullivan, 919

F.2d 503, 508–10 (8th Cir. 1990). According to the Eighth Circuit, the United States Department of Labor's Consumer Price Index, “constitutes ‘proper proof’ of the increased cost of living since the EAJA's enactment. Id. at 504. The Court finds that the increase in cost of living justifies a fee higher than $125 per hour and that the rates Plaintiff requested are reasonable. The Court carefully reviewed the hours submitted and finds them reasonable in all aspects. Thus, the Court concludes that both the amount requested, and the hours expended, are reasonable. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2412(c). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees, Filing No. 28, is granted. 2. Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, attorney fees in the amount of $7,576.39 are to be paid directly to the plaintiff’s attorney, less any offset to satisfy a pre- existing debt to the United States. Such awards shall be paid by the Social Security Administration. 3. A separate judgment shall be entered in conjunction with this Memorandum and

Order. Dated this 3rd day of June, 2026. BY THE COURT:

s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Senior United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Demarie Dian Reedy v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demarie-dian-reedy-v-frank-bisignano-commissioner-of-the-social-security-ned-2026.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack