DeMaria v. Yolo County Sheriff's Office

District Court, E.D. California·Decided August 27, 2024·No. 2:23-cv-01798·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3

5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 CHRISTINE DEMARIA, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-01798-KJM-CSK 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 v. (ECF No. 37) 15 YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al., 16 Defendants. 17

19 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 20 21 37), and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See 22 L.R. 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following 23 clarification. 24 The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain 25 jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 26 27 141.1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, at *2 28 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain -1- 1 || jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus, the 2 | Court will not retain jurisdiction over this protective order once the case is closed. 4 5 Dated: August 26, 2024 4 (han Spo \L CHI S00 KIM 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Q |] 4,demal798.23 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 —,_[,_. 3 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1 SERENA M. WARNER, ESQ., SBN 264799 Email: swarner@akk-law.com 2 DERICK E. KONZ, ESQ., SBN 286902 3 Email: dkonz@akk-law.com WILLIAM J. BITTNER, ESQ., SBN 292056 4 Email: wbittner@akk-law.com ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP 5 Attorneys at Law 6 601 University Avenue, Suite 150 Sacramento, CA 95825 7 Telephone: (916) 564-6100 Telecopier: (916) 564-6263 8

Attorneys for Defendants YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, TOM LOPEZ, GARY 9 HALLENBECK, MICHAEL GLASER, ROBERT MIDDLEMAN, MATTHEW WIRICK, 10 SAMUEL MACHADO, NEAL GOODRICH, GARY RICHTER, TONYA TOLENTINO, AND HERNAN VEGA 11

12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13

14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15

16 CHRISTINE DEMARIA, et al., ) Case No.: 2:23-CV-01798-KJM-CSK ) 17 Plaintiffs, ) STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 18 ) vs. ) 19 ) YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al., ) 20 ) 21 Defendants. ) ) 22

24 25 26 27 28 -3- 1 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 3 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 4 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 5 This is likely to include medical records, sensitive information contained within personnel files, 6 and third party sensitive information such as citizen complaints. 7 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to the following Protective Order. The parties 8 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 9 discovery, and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the 10 limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal 11 principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Order 12 does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Local Rule 141 sets forth the 13 procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks 14 permission from the court to file material under seal. 15 2. DEFINITIONS 16 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 17 information or items under this Order. 18 2.2 "CONFIDENTIAL" Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 19 generated, stored, or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 20 of Civil Procedure 26(c), including medical records, sensitive information contained within 21 personnel files, and third party sensitive information such as citizen complaints. 22 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as 23 well as their support staff). 24 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 25 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as "CONFIDENTIAL." 26 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 27 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 28 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or -4- 1 responses to discovery in this matter. 2 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 3 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 4 consultant in this action. 5 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House 6 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 7 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 8 entity not named as a Party to this action. 9 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this 10 action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action 11 on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 12 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 13 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staff). 14 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 15 Material in this action. 16 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 17 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 18 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 19 subcontractors. 20 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 21 "CONFIDENTIAL." 22 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 23 Producing Party. 24 3. SCOPE 25 The protections conferred by this Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined 26 above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, 27 excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, 28 or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the -5- 1 protections conferred by this Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information 2 that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the 3 public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a 4 violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; 5 and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the 6 Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and 7 under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at 8 trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 9 4. DURATION 10 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 11 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 12 otherwise directs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DeMaria v. Yolo County Sheriff's Office, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

DeMaria v. Yolo County Sheriff's Office (DeMaria v. Yolo County Sheriff's Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.