Demarest v. Demarest
61 A. 569, 66 N.J. Eq. 433, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 211
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Emery filed in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — Dixon, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Vredenburgh, Green — 6.
For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Fort, Bogert, Vroom, Gray — 6.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Demarest v. Demarest, 61 A. 569, 66 N.J. Eq. 433, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 211 (N.J. 1904).
61 A. 569 (Demarest v. Demarest) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.