Demarest v. Demarest

61 A. 569, 66 N.J. Eq. 433, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 211
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 29, 1904
StatusPublished

This text of 61 A. 569 (Demarest v. Demarest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Demarest v. Demarest, 61 A. 569, 66 N.J. Eq. 433, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 211 (N.J. 1904).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Emery filed in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — Dixon, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Vredenburgh, Green — 6.

For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Fort, Bogert, Vroom, Gray — 6.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 A. 569, 66 N.J. Eq. 433, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demarest-v-demarest-nj-1904.