Demareo Jamaine Allen v. Kinross Correctional Facility Warden
This text of Demareo Jamaine Allen v. Kinross Correctional Facility Warden (Demareo Jamaine Allen v. Kinross Correctional Facility Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 3, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack 153300 & (33)(35) David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Kurtis T. Wilder Elizabeth T. Clement, DEMAREO JAMAINE ALLEN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 153300 COA: 330153 KINROSS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY WARDEN, Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 2, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to strike and the motion for entry of default judgment are DENIED. The motion for miscellaneous relief is DENIED.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 3, 2018 a0326 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Demareo Jamaine Allen v. Kinross Correctional Facility Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demareo-jamaine-allen-v-kinross-correctional-facility-warden-mich-2018.