Demareo Jamaine Allen v. Kinross Correctional Facility Warden

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 3, 2018·No. 153300·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

April 3, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

153300 & (33)(35) David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement,

DEMAREO JAMAINE ALLEN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 153300 COA: 330153

KINROSS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY WARDEN, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 2, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to strike and the motion for entry of default judgment are DENIED. The motion for miscellaneous relief is DENIED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 3, 2018

a0326 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Demareo Jamaine Allen v. Kinross Correctional Facility Warden, (Mich. 2018).

Demareo Jamaine Allen v. Kinross Correctional Facility Warden (Demareo Jamaine Allen v. Kinross Correctional Facility Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.