Demarcus West v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 26, 2023·No. A23A1113·Published

Opinion

THIRD DIVISION

DOYLE, P. J.,

GOBEIL, J., and SENIOR JUDGE FULLER

NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed.

https://www.gaappeals.us/rules

September 26, 2023

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A23A1113. WEST v. THE STATE.

FULLER, Senior Judge.

Following the denial of his motion for new trial, Demarcus West appeals his convictions of aggravated sodomy and other crimes. West contends that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because his lawyer failed to object when the prosecutor, in closing argument, (a) expressed his opinion about the veracity of the victim and (b) improperly commented on his role as a prosecutor. We disagree and affirm.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the jury verdict,1 the record shows that the victim and her son lived on the third floor of an apartment building. One morning

1 “On appeal from a criminal conviction, the defendant is no longer presumed innocent and all of the evidence is to be viewed in the light most favorable to the jury verdict.” Johnson v. State, 304 Ga. 610, 612 (1) (b) (820 SE2d 690) (2018).

in October 2016, the victim got her son ready for school and took him down to the sidewalk to meet his friends to walk to school. The victim left her apartment door unlocked and was gone for about three minutes. When she returned, she saw the light in her bathroom turn off, and she went to investigate.

The victim pushed on the bathroom door but could not open it because there was a man behind it. She saw the man in the bathroom mirror, did not recognize him, and tried to run, but the man grabbed her from behind, choked her, and dragged her by her hair into the living room. There, he ripped off her shorts and flipped her shirt over her head so that she could not breathe. The man then removed her shirt, leaving her naked. He asked her if she had “ever been f--ked in [her] ass,” punched her face repeatedly, and kicked her until she began to lose consciousness. He put his hand on her vagina, stuck his fingers in her mouth, and licked her breast. Then he pinned her on the floor and put his penis in her mouth. The victim fought back by punching the man in the face, and he jumped off of her and ran out the front door.

Still naked, the victim crawled to her balcony, where she screamed for help and tried to jump over, afraid that the man would return and kill her. Two neighbors and a retired police officer who was in the area heard the victim’s screams, came to help, and called 911. They described the victim as “really scared,” “shak[en] up,” and

crying uncontrollably. The victim was taken to the hospital, where medical personnel completed a sexual assault kit and noted scratches on her thigh, abrasions on her face and both knees, swelling on her lip, and scratches and bruises on her arm. A nurse testified that these injuries were consistent with the victim’s account of events. Swabs taken from the victim’s body were later submitted for forensic testing, which showed the presence of seminal fluid in the victim’s mouth2 and West’s DNA on her breast.

Inside the victim’s apartment, “things [were] lying around the floor like they had been knocked over,” and “ripped” pieces of the victim’s shorts were strewn “all over.” The victim’s shirt was missing, but surveillance footage from the apartment building showed a man walking away from the complex at the time of the incident with a shirt slung over his shoulder that matched the description of the victim’s shirt. Based on the victim’s description of her attacker and the services of a forensic sketch artist, police compiled photographic line-ups of potential suspects, and the victim identified West as her attacker.

West was charged with aggravated sodomy, attempted rape, sexual battery, burglary, and aggravated assault by strangulation. The case proceeded to trial, where

2 Because this seminal fluid did not contain sperm cells, it was not tested for DNA.

the victim again identified West as her attacker. West elected not to testify and presented no evidence in his defense. In closing argument, his attorney maintained that the victim’s account was not credible, while the prosecutor countered that it was. The jury found West guilty of all charges. He filed a motion for new trial, raising claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The trial court denied the motion, and this appeal followed.

West argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because his lawyer did not object to the prosecutor’s comments in closing argument about the credibility of the victim and his prosecutorial role. We find no ineffective assistance.

To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that his trial attorney’s performance was deficient and that this deficient performance prejudiced his defense. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U. S. 668, 687 (III) (104 SCt 2052, 80 LE2d 674) (1984). Deficient performance requires a showing that trial counsel “made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the ‘counsel’ guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.” Id. Prejudice requires demonstrating “a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, the outcome of the trial would have been different.” Smith v. State, 296 Ga. 731, 733 (2) (770 SE2d 610) (2015). “If either Strickland prong is not met, [a reviewing court] need not

examine the other prong.” Walker v. State, 312 Ga. 232, 239 (4) (862 SE2d 285) (2021) (citation and punctuation omitted).

(a) In his closing argument, the prosecutor told the jury, “[The victim]’s been honest with us and she’s been honest with the police.” Later, the prosecutor said, “Why do we believe [the victim]? Because we have every reason to and no reason not to. She has no reason to lie.” Defense counsel did not object to these statements. West argues that counsel’s failure to object amounted to ineffective assistance, but we do not agree.

At the hearing on West’s motion for new trial, defense counsel explained that a key focus of his trial strategy was to cast doubt on the victim’s credibility. Counsel testified that, because he “went on for about a half an hour commenting on [the victim’s] v[e]racity” in his own closing argument, he considered that topic to be “fair game” and thus found nothing wrong with the prosecutor’s comments. Counsel elaborated: “I think closing argument is built for that sort of thing. That’s how I argue; that’s how [the prosecutor] argues.”

“Closing arguments are judged in the context in which they are made.” Pitts v.

State, 323 Ga. App. 770, 774 (3) (747 SE2d 699) (2013) (citation and punctuation omitted). “A prosecutor is granted wide latitude in the conduct of closing argument,

the bounds of which are in the trial court’s discretion. Within that wide latitude, a prosecutor may comment upon and draw deductions from the evidence presented to the jury.” Arnold v. State, 309 Ga. 573, 577 (2) (a) (847 SE2d 358) (2020) (citation and punctuation omitted). “While it is improper for counsel to state to the jury counsel’s personal belief as to the veracity of a witness[,] it is not improper for counsel to urge the jury to draw such a conclusion from the evidence.” Jones v. State, 361 Ga. App. 839, 842 (2) (b) (865 SE2d 836) (2021) (citation and punctuation omitted); see also Moody v. State, 273 Ga. 24, 27 (4) (537 SE2d 666) (2000) (prosecutor may properly “urge[ ] the jury to make a deduction about veracity from the facts”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Demarcus West v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2023).

Demarcus West v. State (Demarcus West v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Johnson v. State
519 S.E.2d 221 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999)
Nguyen v. State
676 S.E.2d 246 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)
Braithwaite v. State
572 S.E.2d 612 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2002)
Moody v. State
537 S.E.2d 666 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2000)
Smith v. State
703 S.E.2d 629 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)
Reeves v. the State
765 S.E.2d 407 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)
Smith v. State
770 S.E.2d 610 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2015)
Smith v. State
703 S.E.2d 628 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2010)
Johnson v. State
820 S.E.2d 690 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
Maurer v. State
740 S.E.2d 318 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013)
Pitts v. State
747 S.E.2d 699 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013)
Arnold v. State
847 S.E.2d 358 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2020)
Gaston v. State
837 S.E.2d 808 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2020)
Walker v. the States
312 Ga. 232 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2021)