DeMarco v. DeMarco

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

DeMarco v. DeMarco

643 A.2d 1029, 274 N.J. Super. 210, 1994 N.J. Super. LEXIS 258

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedMay 13, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 643 A.2d 1029 (DeMarco v. DeMarco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeMarco v. DeMarco, 643 A.2d 1029, 274 N.J. Super. 210, 1994 N.J. Super. LEXIS 258 (N.J. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment of the Law Division dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Josephine DeMarco against her mother defendant Mary DeMarco is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Winkelstein in his written opinion of November 10, 1992 reported at 274 N.J.Super. 257, 643 A.2d 1053 (Law Div.). We are satisfied from our study of the record and the arguments presented that defendant is shielded by parental immunity. See Foldi v. Jeffries, 93 N.J. 533, 551, 461 A.2d 1145 (1983). We are also satisfied that summary judgment was the appropriate procedure to be employed. Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Westfield, 17 N.J. 67, 73-75, 110 A.2d 24 (1954). All of the issues of law raised are clearly without merit. R. 2:ll-3(e)(l)(E).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment of the Law Division dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Josephine DeMarco against her mother defendant Mary DeMarco is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Winkelstein in his written opinion of November 10, 1992 reported at 274 N.J.Super. 257, 643 A.2d 1053 (Law Div.). We are satisfied from our study of the record and the arguments presented that defendant is shielded by parental immunity. See Foldi v. Jeffries, 93 N.J. 533, 551, 461 A.2d 1145 (1983). We are also satisfied that summary judgment was the appropriate procedure to be employed. Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Westfield, 17 N.J. 67, 73-75, 110 A.2d 24 (1954). All of the issues of law raised are clearly without merit. R. 2:ll-3(e)(l)(E).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

643 A.2d 1029, 274 N.J. Super. 210, 1994 N.J. Super. LEXIS 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demarco-v-demarco-njsuperctappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack