Demarco v. Demarco

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Demarco v. Demarco

119 So. 3d 542, 2013 WL 4482994, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13449, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1804

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 23, 2013·No. No. 5D12-4596·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dean P. Demarco appeals a final judgment dissolving his marriage to Kim D. Demarco. Specifically, Mr. Demarco contends that both the amount and duration of the alimony awarded in this long-term marriage was an abuse of the trial court’s discretion. Having carefully reviewed the record, we disagree and affirm. Our affir-mance is, however, without prejudice to Mr. Demarco to seek a modification of the amount of his alimony upon retirement. See Pimm v. Pimm, 601 So.2d 534 (Fla.1992); see also § 61.08(7), Fla. Stat. (2012).

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Dean P. Demarco appeals a final judgment dissolving his marriage to Kim D. Demarco. Specifically, Mr. Demarco contends that both the amount and duration of the alimony awarded in this long-term marriage was an abuse of the trial court’s discretion. Having carefully reviewed the record, we disagree and affirm. Our affir-mance is, however, without prejudice to Mr. Demarco to seek a modification of the amount of his alimony upon retirement. See Pimm v. Pimm, 601 So.2d 534 (Fla.1992); see also § 61.08(7), Fla. Stat. (2012).

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Demarco v. Demarco, 119 So. 3d 542, 2013 WL 4482994, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13449, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1804 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

119 So. 3d 542 (Demarco v. Demarco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related