DeMarco v. DeAnglis
This text of 283 A.D.2d 388 (DeMarco v. DeAnglis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mason, J.), entered June 5, 2000, as, upon a jury verdict finding the defendant Lawrence Campanella 100% at fault in the happening of the accident, failed to apportion liability against the defendant Laura Ferrara, and the defendant Lawrence Campanella cross-appeals from the same judgment.
Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,
Ordered that the defendant Laura Ferrara is awarded one bill of costs.
A reasonable view of the evidence supports the jury’s determination that, although the defendant Laura Ferrara was negligent, her negligence was not a proximate cause of the accident (see, Gross v Napoli, 216 AD2d 524). Consequently, the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Altman, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D.2d 388, 723 N.Y.S.2d 863, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demarco-v-deanglis-nyappdiv-2001.