Demar v. Van Zandt

New York Supreme Court

Demar v. Van Zandt

2 Johns. Cas. 69

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1800

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Johns. Cas. 69 (Demar v. Van Zandt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Demar v. Van Zandt, 2 Johns. Cas. 69 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Let the commission issue: the affidavit, although made by a third person, shows probable grounds to believe that the testimony of the witness may be material. Besides, it cannot injure the tenant, by creating delay, for the application is not in time to have the effect of suspending the proceedings in the suit, or of excusing the demandants for not going to trial.

Rule granted.(

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Let the commission issue: the affidavit, although made by a third person, shows probable grounds to believe that the testimony of the witness may be material. Besides, it cannot injure the tenant, by creating delay, for the application is not in time to have the effect of suspending the proceedings in the suit, or of excusing the demandants for not going to trial.

Rule granted.(

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Johns. Cas. 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demar-v-van-zandt-nysupct-1800.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack