Demaio v. Yeshiva University Development Foundation, Inc.

38 A.D.3d 473, 833 N.Y.S.2d 54

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered March 8, 2006, which [474] granted defendant Montefiore’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Montefiore established its prima facie entitlement to summary dismissal (Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]) by submitting evidence demonstrating that it did not lease the premises where the decedent’s accident occurred. Plaintiff failed to raise any triable issues of fact, relying solely on inadmissible evidence, which cannot form the basis for denial of summary judgment (see Wertheimer v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., 85 AD2d 540, 541 [1981]). Concur—Andrias, J.P, Friedman, Buckley, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Demaio v. Yeshiva University Development Foundation, Inc., 38 A.D.3d 473, 833 N.Y.S.2d 54 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

38 A.D.3d 473 (Demaio v. Yeshiva University Development Foundation, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital
501 N.E.2d 572 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Wertheimer v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting
85 A.D.2d 540 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)