DeMaeght v. Gustafson

Michigan Court of Appeals

DeMaeght v. Gustafson

162 N.W.2d 149, 11 Mich. App. 698, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1364

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 24, 1968

DocketDocket No. 3,510

StatusPublished

This text of 162 N.W.2d 149 (DeMaeght v. Gustafson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeMaeght v. Gustafson, 162 N.W.2d 149, 11 Mich. App. 698, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1364 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial judge, sitting without a jury, found as a matter of fact both plaintiff and defendant guilty of neglig*ence. Upon appeal the [699]*699plaintiff raises the basic issue of the sufficiency of evidence. A review of the record supports the finding of fact by the trial judge. The finding not being clearly erroneous, we affirm.

Costs to appellees.

Lesinski, C. J., and Burns and Fenlon, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The trial judge, sitting without a jury, found as a matter of fact both plaintiff and defendant guilty of neglig*ence. Upon appeal the [699]*699plaintiff raises the basic issue of the sufficiency of evidence. A review of the record supports the finding of fact by the trial judge. The finding not being clearly erroneous, we affirm.

Costs to appellees.

Lesinski, C. J., and Burns and Fenlon, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 N.W.2d 149, 11 Mich. App. 698, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demaeght-v-gustafson-michctapp-1968.