DeMaeght v. Gustafson

Michigan Court of Appeals

DeMaeght v. Gustafson

162 N.W.2d 149, 11 Mich. App. 698, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1364

Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided June 24, 1968·No. Docket No. 3,510·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial judge, sitting without a jury, found as a matter of fact both plaintiff and defendant guilty of neglig*ence. Upon appeal the [699] plaintiff raises the basic issue of the sufficiency of evidence. A review of the record supports the finding of fact by the trial judge. The finding not being clearly erroneous, we affirm.

Costs to appellees.

Lesinski, C. J., and Burns and Fenlon, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The trial judge, sitting without a jury, found as a matter of fact both plaintiff and defendant guilty of neglig*ence. Upon appeal the [699] plaintiff raises the basic issue of the sufficiency of evidence. A review of the record supports the finding of fact by the trial judge. The finding not being clearly erroneous, we affirm.

Costs to appellees.

Lesinski, C. J., and Burns and Fenlon, JJ., concurred.

DeMaeght v. Gustafson, 162 N.W.2d 149, 11 Mich. App. 698, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1364 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

162 N.W.2d 149 (DeMaeght v. Gustafson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.