D.E.M. v. State

916 So. 2d 65, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19715
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 14, 2005·No. No. 3D05-1208·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Perez-Garcia, 917 So.2d 894 (Fla. 3d DCA Case no. 3D04-1510, opinion filed, Oct. 12, 2005); State v. Howard, 909 So.2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); see also Cady v. Dombrowski, 413 U.S. 433, 93 S.Ct. 2523, 37 L.Ed.2d 706 (1973); Hilton v. State, 901 So.2d 155 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), notice for discretionary review filed, No. SC05-438 (Fla. March 14, 2005); Tubbs v. State, 897 So.2d 520, 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Cobb v. State, 378 [66] So.2d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1111 (Fla.1980); State v. Tully, 166 Conn. 126, 348 A.2d 603 (1974).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D.E.M. v. State, 916 So. 2d 65, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19715 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

916 So. 2d 65 (D.E.M. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

D.E.M. v. State
985 So. 2d 1222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
D.E.M. v. State
979 So. 2d 954 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
Hilton v. State
961 So. 2d 284 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)