Delzer v. United Bank of Bismarck - Civil No. 960093
This text of Delzer v. United Bank of Bismarck - Civil No. 960093 (Delzer v. United Bank of Bismarck - Civil No. 960093) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Go to Documents] | Filed Jan. 16, 1997 |
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
1997 ND 5
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appelleev.
Juan A. Torres, Defendant and Appellant
Criminal No. 960244
Appeal from the District Court for Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Norman J. Backes, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Stephen R. Dawson (argued), Assistant State's Attorney, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, ND 58108-2806, for plaintiff and appellee.
Juan A. Torres, pro se.
State v. Torres
Criminal No. 960244
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Juan A. Torres appeals from an order revoking his deferred imposition of sentence for terrorizing and sentencing him to two years in prison. Torres claims he received ineffective assistance of counsel during the revocation proceeding. On this record, Torres has not shown his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective. See, e.g., State v. Denney, 417 N.W.2d 181, 182-83 (N.D. 1987) (without a record scrutinizing the reasons underlying counsel's conduct, review of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is virtually impossible on direct appeal).
[¶2] We affirm the revocation order under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).
| [¶3] | Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Dale V. Sandstrom William A. Neumann Mary Muehlen Maring Herbert L. Meschke |
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Delzer v. United Bank of Bismarck - Civil No. 960093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delzer-v-united-bank-of-bismarck-civil-no-960093-nd-1997.