Delvecchio v. Levittown Union Free School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Delvecchio v. Levittown Union Free School District

303 A.D.2d 541, 756 N.Y.S.2d 459, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2649

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 303 A.D.2d 541 (Delvecchio v. Levittown Union Free School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Delvecchio v. Levittown Union Free School District, 303 A.D.2d 541, 756 N.Y.S.2d 459, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2649 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the third-party defendant Stasi Brothers Asphalt Corp. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), dated January 16, 2000, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it, and the third-party defendant John A. Grillo, Architect, P.C. separately appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the same order as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined there were issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. S. Miller, J.P., Schmidt, Townes and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the third-party defendant Stasi Brothers Asphalt Corp. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), dated January 16, 2000, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it, and the third-party defendant John A. Grillo, Architect, P.C. separately appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the same order as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined there were issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. S. Miller, J.P., Schmidt, Townes and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 A.D.2d 541, 756 N.Y.S.2d 459, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delvecchio-v-levittown-union-free-school-district-nyappdiv-2003.