Delva v. State
571 So. 2d 1, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1773, 1990 WL 154195
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 20, 1990·No. No. 88-1430·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING AND CERTIFICATION
We deny the State’s motion for rehearing.
We grant the State’s request for certification of a question of great public importance:
In a case tried prior to the decision in State v. Dominguez, 509 So.2d 917 (Fla.1987), is it fundamental error to fail to instruct the jury that in order to convict, the State must prove that defendant knew the substance contained in the package in defendant’s car was cocaine, where the instructions were susceptible of the reading that knowing possession of the package containing the substance was sufficient to convict, and where the error is urged on direct appeal from the conviction, not on collateral attack.
Motion for rehearing denied; question certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Delva v. State, 571 So. 2d 1, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1773, 1990 WL 154195 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
571 So. 2d 1 (Delva v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Delva
575 So. 2d 643 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)