DeLullo v. Bank of America

Fourth Circuit

DeLullo v. Bank of America

475 F. App'x 857

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 24, 2012·No. No. 12-1426·Published

Opinion

[858] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John DeLullo appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. DeLullo v. Bank of Am., No. 2:11-cv-00660-R AJ-TEM (E.D.Va. Mar. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[858] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John DeLullo appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. DeLullo v. Bank of Am., No. 2:11-cv-00660-R AJ-TEM (E.D.Va. Mar. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

DeLullo v. Bank of America, 475 F. App'x 857 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

475 F. App'x 857 (DeLullo v. Bank of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.