DeLuca's Case
This text of 193 N.E.2d 681 (DeLuca's Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Decree affirmed. This is an appeal from a decree of the Superior Court dismissing a claim by a widow for compensation for the death of her husband. The single member, whose decision was affirmed by the reviewing board, found that the claimant had failed to establish that the death of the employee was causally connected with an injury arising out of his employment. The employee had been a worker in a shoe factory with some exposure to dust and it was claimed that his death was caused by occupational pneumoconiosis. An autopsy did not substantiate this claim. The finding by the single member was predicated on the absence of medical testimony sufficient to link in causal relationship the employee’s occupation and his death. There was no error. See Sevigny’s Case, 337 Mass. 747, 749. Prejudicial error possible in the exclusion of certain evidence was cured by its admission thereafter through a subsequent witness. Carson v. Boston Elev. Ry. 309 Mass. 32, 35.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 N.E.2d 681, 346 Mass. 766, 1963 Mass. LEXIS 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delucas-case-mass-1963.