DeLuca v. Smithkline Beckman Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

DeLuca v. Smithkline Beckman Corp.

116 A.D.2d 905, 498 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51701

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 23, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 116 A.D.2d 905 (DeLuca v. Smithkline Beckman Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeLuca v. Smithkline Beckman Corp., 116 A.D.2d 905, 498 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51701 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Cholakis, J.), entered December 17, 1984 in Rensselaer County, which, inter alia, denied plaintiffs’ motion in action No. 2 to dismiss the affirmative defense of the Statute of Limitations and granted defendants’ cross motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2) from two orders of said court, entered December 14, 1984 and March 12, 1985 in Rensselaer County, which granted defendants’ motion in action No. 1 to dismiss the complaint.

Orders affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of Justice Con. G. Cholakis at Special Term. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Cholakis, J.), entered December 17, 1984 in Rensselaer County, which, inter alia, denied plaintiffs’ motion in action No. 2 to dismiss the affirmative defense of the Statute of Limitations and granted defendants’ cross motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2) from two orders of said court, entered December 14, 1984 and March 12, 1985 in Rensselaer County, which granted defendants’ motion in action No. 1 to dismiss the complaint.

Orders affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of Justice Con. G. Cholakis at Special Term. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 A.D.2d 905, 498 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deluca-v-smithkline-beckman-corp-nyappdiv-1986.