DeLuca Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

DeLuca Unemployment Compensation Case

182 A.2d 279, 198 Pa. Super. 120, 1962 Pa. Super. LEXIS 659

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 13, 1962

DocketAppeal, No. 53

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 182 A.2d 279 (DeLuca Unemployment Compensation Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeLuca Unemployment Compensation Case, 182 A.2d 279, 198 Pa. Super. 120, 1962 Pa. Super. LEXIS 659 (Pa. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

In this unemployment compensation case the bureau, the referee and the board all concluded that the appellant had terminated his employment without a necessitous and compelling reason and that he was disqualified from receiving benefits under §402(b) (1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802 (b).

Appellant was last employed as a truck driver for Woody’s Poultry, Bridgeville, Pennsylvania, at a wage of $65.00 per week, having been thus employed for one year and nine months. The board found on adequate evidence that he had vountarily terminated his employment because he felt the pay was inadequate and £he working hours too long.

[121]*121Mere dissatisfaction with the wages and working assignments does not constitute cause of a necessitous and compelling nature for terminating one’s employment. This case is ruled by Barittisky Unemployment Compensation Case, 189 Pa. Superior Ct. 473, 151 A. 2d 874.

Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI