Delta Novelty Co. v. United States
62 Cust. Ct. 1085, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3316
United States Customs Court·Decided April 28, 1969·No. No. P69/121; protests 67/15902, etc. (New York); No. P69/122; protests 67/20260, etc. (New York); No. P 69/123; protests 67/30476, etc. (New York); No. P69/124; protests 67/34393, etc. (Boston); No. P69/125; protests 67/36345, etc. (New York); Po. P69/126; protests 67/55000, etc. (Los Angeles); No. P69/127; protests 67/83206 and 67/6396 (Philadelphia); No. P69/128; protests 67/86015-6153, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/129; protests 68/33639-7892, etc. (Chicago)·Published
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers, trees, foliage, fruits, vegetables, grasses, or grains, and articles made of the foregoing, in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same manner as the merchandise the subject of Armbee (Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and Zunold Trading Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Delta Novelty Co. v. United States, 62 Cust. Ct. 1085, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3316 (cusc 1969).
62 Cust. Ct. 1085 (Delta Novelty Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Armbee Corp. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 105 (U.S. Customs Court, 1968)
Zunold Trading Corp. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 112 (U.S. Customs Court, 1968)