Delta Novelty Co. v. United States

62 Cust. Ct. 1085, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3316

• Court: United States Customs Court
• Decided: April 28, 1969
• Docket: No. P69/121; protests 67/15902, etc. (New York); No. P69/122; protests 67/20260, etc. (New York); No. P 69/123; protests 67/30476, etc. (New York); No. P69/124; protests 67/34393, etc. (Boston); No. P69/125; protests 67/36345, etc. (New York); Po. P69/126; protests 67/55000, etc. (Los Angeles); No. P69/127; protests 67/83206 and 67/6396 (Philadelphia); No. P69/128; protests 67/86015-6153, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/129; protests 68/33639-7892, etc. (Chicago)
• Status: Published

Opinion

WatsoN, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers, trees, foliage, fruits, vegetables, grasses, or grains, and articles made of the foregoing, in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same manner as the merchandise the subject of Armbee (Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and Zunold Trading Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.