Delta D Construction Corp. v. Triangle Marine Construction, of Key West, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Delta D Construction Corp. v. Triangle Marine Construction, of Key West, Inc.

567 So. 2d 1010, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7696, 1990 WL 149796

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 9, 1990

DocketNo. 90-557

StatusPublished

This text of 567 So. 2d 1010 (Delta D Construction Corp. v. Triangle Marine Construction, of Key West, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Delta D Construction Corp. v. Triangle Marine Construction, of Key West, Inc., 567 So. 2d 1010, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7696, 1990 WL 149796 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, defendants in an action on a construction contract, are correct in all three issues raised by this appeal from an adverse judgment.

First, in the absence of an agreement fixing the rate of interest in the event of an action to enforce the contract, the statutory interest rate applies. Celotex Corp. v. Buildex, Inc., 476 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), rev. denied, 486 So.2d 595 (Fla.1986). Second, in an action against a corporation which has been involuntarily dissolved and reinstated, the judgment against the corporation has no effect upon any personal liability of the directors, officers or agents of the corporation for actions taken during the period between dissolution and reinstatement. § 607.271(5), Fla.Stat. (1989). It was therefore improper to enter a judgment against Dolores Burns as the surviving trustee. Finally, prejudgment interest began to run from the date the claim became liquidated by agreement of the parties, which, according to the un[1011]*1011disputed evidence, was no sooner than August 11, 1988.

The judgment in favor of Triangle Marine is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for the entry of a new judgment in accordance with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, defendants in an action on a construction contract, are correct in all three issues raised by this appeal from an adverse judgment.

First, in the absence of an agreement fixing the rate of interest in the event of an action to enforce the contract, the statutory interest rate applies. Celotex Corp. v. Buildex, Inc., 476 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), rev. denied, 486 So.2d 595 (Fla.1986). Second, in an action against a corporation which has been involuntarily dissolved and reinstated, the judgment against the corporation has no effect upon any personal liability of the directors, officers or agents of the corporation for actions taken during the period between dissolution and reinstatement. § 607.271(5), Fla.Stat. (1989). It was therefore improper to enter a judgment against Dolores Burns as the surviving trustee. Finally, prejudgment interest began to run from the date the claim became liquidated by agreement of the parties, which, according to the un[1011]*1011disputed evidence, was no sooner than August 11, 1988.

The judgment in favor of Triangle Marine is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for the entry of a new judgment in accordance with this opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

567 So. 2d 1010, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7696, 1990 WL 149796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delta-d-construction-corp-v-triangle-marine-construction-of-key-west-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack