Delta Brands International Corp. v. Banco de la Nacion Argentina, New York Branch

487 So. 2d 405, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7581
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 29, 1986·No. No. 85-1444·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order dismissing counts I and II of appellant’s counterclaim, see Star Fruit Co. v. Eagle Lake Growers, Inc., 160 Fla. 130, 33 So.2d 858 (1948); Rosen v. Marlin, 486 So.2d 623 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Schimmel v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc., 464 So.2d 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Belford Trucking Co. v. Zagar, 243 So.2d 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970); see also Dilg v. Bank of United States, 244 A.D. 223, 278 N.Y.S. 972 (1935), appeal denied, 270 N.Y. 673 (1936), without prejudice to appellant’s amending the counterclaim to state a claim for appropriate relief.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Delta Brands International Corp. v. Banco de la Nacion Argentina, New York Branch, 487 So. 2d 405, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7581 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

487 So. 2d 405 (Delta Brands International Corp. v. Banco de la Nacion Argentina, New York Branch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Belford Trucking Co. v. Zagar
243 So. 2d 646 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Schimmel v. MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE ETC.
464 So. 2d 602 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Rosen v. Marlin
486 So. 2d 623 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Star Fruit Co. v. Eagle Lake Growers, Inc.
33 So. 2d 858 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)
Dilg v. Bank of United States
244 A.D. 223 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)