Delseta M. Heslop v. The Townhomes of Plantation Condominium Association, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Delseta M. Heslop v. The Townhomes of Plantation Condominium Association, Inc.

149 So. 3d 115, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14369, 2014 WL 4626707

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 17, 2014

Docket4D13-4803

StatusPublished

This text of 149 So. 3d 115 (Delseta M. Heslop v. The Townhomes of Plantation Condominium Association, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Delseta M. Heslop v. The Townhomes of Plantation Condominium Association, Inc., 149 So. 3d 115, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14369, 2014 WL 4626707 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court’s post-judgment orders: (1) denying the defendant’s motion to quash service and to vacate foreclosure sale; (2) overruling the defendant’s objection to sale; (3) denying the defendant’s emergency amended motion to vacate final judgment; (4) denying the defendant’s emergency motion for reconsideration; and (5) denying the defendant’s emergency motion to preclude issuance of writ of possession. However, we remand for the circuit court to amend the final judgment to reflect that it was entered as a final summary judgment upon the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, not as a final default judgment upon the plaintiffs motion for final default judgment.

Affirmed and remanded.

WARNER, STEVENSON and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court’s post-judgment orders: (1) denying the defendant’s motion to quash service and to vacate foreclosure sale; (2) overruling the defendant’s objection to sale; (3) denying the defendant’s emergency amended motion to vacate final judgment; (4) denying the defendant’s emergency motion for reconsideration; and (5) denying the defendant’s emergency motion to preclude issuance of writ of possession. However, we remand for the circuit court to amend the final judgment to reflect that it was entered as a final summary judgment upon the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, not as a final default judgment upon the plaintiffs motion for final default judgment.

Affirmed and remanded.

WARNER, STEVENSON and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 So. 3d 115, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14369, 2014 WL 4626707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delseta-m-heslop-v-the-townhomes-of-plantation-condominium-association-fladistctapp-2014.