Delroy, Inc. v. Showcase National Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Delroy, Inc. v. Showcase National Corp.

26 A.D.2d 534, 271 N.Y.S.2d 170, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3917

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 534 (Delroy, Inc. v. Showcase National Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Delroy, Inc. v. Showcase National Corp., 26 A.D.2d 534, 271 N.Y.S.2d 170, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order granting summary judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant and motion for summary judgment denied. Triable issues exist as to whether plaintiff’s services were rendered in reliance upon the individual obligation of Mildred Paddington to pay, or upon the obligation of the separate corporations. A triable issue also exists as to whether the monthly retainer providing for payment of $1,500 per month to the plaintiff was suspended for the months of June, 1963 through December, 1963. It is clear that the plaintiff did not bill for these months. The truth of his explanation that he failed to do so for income tax purposes cannot be determined on affidavits. Concur—■ McNally, J. P., Stevens, Steuer, Capozzoli and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order granting summary judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant and motion for summary judgment denied. Triable issues exist as to whether plaintiff’s services were rendered in reliance upon the individual obligation of Mildred Paddington to pay, or upon the obligation of the separate corporations. A triable issue also exists as to whether the monthly retainer providing for payment of $1,500 per month to the plaintiff was suspended for the months of June, 1963 through December, 1963. It is clear that the plaintiff did not bill for these months. The truth of his explanation that he failed to do so for income tax purposes cannot be determined on affidavits. Concur—■ McNally, J. P., Stevens, Steuer, Capozzoli and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 534, 271 N.Y.S.2d 170, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delroy-inc-v-showcase-national-corp-nyappdiv-1966.