Delphix Corp. v. Matal
This text of Delphix Corp. v. Matal (Delphix Corp. v. Matal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
DELPHIX CORP., Appellant
v.
JOSEPH MATAL, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________
2016-2067, 2016-2068 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2015- 00025, IPR2015-00026. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
J. DAVID HADDEN, Fenwick & West, LLP, Mountain View, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by SAINA S. SHAMILOV; TODD RICHARD GREGORIAN, PHILLIP JOHN HAACK, San Francisco, CA. PHILIP J. WARRICK, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, ar- gued for intervenor. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, COKE MORGAN STEWART. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 12, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Delphix Corp. v. Matal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delphix-corp-v-matal-cafc-2017.