Delozier v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided September 16, 2022·No. 15-124·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: August 22, 2022

************************ CHRISTINE DeLOZIER, * parent and next friend of L.T., a minor, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 15-124V * v. * Special Master Dorsey * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Damages Award; Hepatitis B Vaccine; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Alopecia Areata. * Respondent. * * ************************

Richard Gage, Richard Gage, P.C., Cheyenne, WY, for Petitioner. Julia Marter Collison, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On February 9, 2015, Christine DeLozier 2 (“Petitioner”), as parent and next friend of L.T., a minor, filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“Vaccine Act” or “the Program”), 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq. (2012). 3 Petitioner alleged that L.T. suffered from alopecia areata as the result of a hepatitis B vaccination 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 During pendency of this case, Petitioner changed her last name from Torres to DeLozier, and therefore the case caption was amended. Order dated Feb. 1, 2019 (ECF No. 58). 3 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (2012). All citations in this Decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa.

1 administered on November 6, 2012. Petition at 1 (ECF No. 1). On December 10, 2019, a ruling on entitlement issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation. Ruling on Entitlement dated Dec. 10, 2019 (ECF No. 66). The Chief Special Master found L.T. was entitled to compensation associated with the first occurrence of alopecia areata, but not for any subsequent occurrence of alopecia areata after August 2015. Id. at 2, 24. A damages decision issued on August 11, 2020, awarding Petitioner $50,000.00 in actual pain and suffering. Damages Decision dated Aug. 11, 2020 (ECF No. 75).

Thereafter, Petitioner filed a motion for review, which was granted by Senior Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams, and remanded to the Chief Special Master to determine appropriate compensation for subsequent and future recurrences of L.T.’s alopecia areata. Opinion and Remand Order (“Remand Order”) dated Feb. 19, 2021 (ECF No. 92). Specifically, “[t]he Chief Special Master [was] directed to reopen the evidentiary record on remand and permit the parties to submit additional evidence on damages and retain relevant damages experts, such as life care planners, to render opinions on appropriate compensation for subsequent and future recurrences of L.T.’s [alopecia areata].” Order Clarifying Remand Instructions (“Order Clarifying Remand”) dated June 24, 2021 (ECF No. 110).

A damages hearing was held on June 23, 2022. After the undersigned’s Bench Rulings during the hearing, the only item that remained in dispute was Petitioner’s actual and future pain and suffering award. Ruling Awarding Pain & Suffering dated Aug. 1, 2022, at 2 (ECF No. 170). On August 1, 2022, the undersigned issued a ruling awarding pain and suffering, finding that in addition to the award of $50,000.00, Petitioner is entitled to receive an additional award in the amount of $70,000.00 (to reflect 2015 to present) for actual pain and suffering for a total of $120,000.00, and an award for future pain and suffering in the amount of $10,000.00 per year, reduced to net present value, for L.T.’s remaining life expectancy or until the statutory cap of $250,000.00 is met. Id.

On August 22, 2022, Respondent filed a joint status report in response to the undersigned’s ruling awarding pain and suffering (“Joint Status Rept.”), attached hereto as Appendix A. Respondent submitted the Joint Status Report providing a statement of all damages, including those that the parties have agreed upon as well as those decided by the undersigned, in the manner that the parties agree upon. Joint Status Rept. at 1. In the joint status report, Respondent represented that Petitioner does not object to the representations made. Id. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Joint Status Report.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Joint Status Report, the undersigned awards Petitioner:

(1) A lump sum payment of $257,153.97, representing compensation for life care expenses (including health insurance premiums and maximum out of pocket, topical Tofacitinib ointment, National Alopecia Areata Annual Meeting, Alopecia Areata Support Group/Group Therapy, and mileage expenses awarded by the Special Master) expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($14,603.20), and pain and suffering ($242,550.77), in the

2 form of a check payable to Petitioner, as guardian(s)/ conservator(s) of the estate of L.T., for the benefit of L.T.

(2) A lump sum payment of $1,953.34, representing compensation for satisfaction of the Monroe County Department of Social Services Medicaid lien, payable jointly to Petitioner and:

Monroe County Department of Social Services ATTN: Susan G. Fittos Resource Recovery Technician 39 West Main Street, Room 307 Rochester, New York 14614 Member ID: ES90155M

(3) An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract described in Section II.C. of the Joint Status Report.

Joint Status Rept. at 3-6.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT herewith. 4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Special Master

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

3 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ____________________________________ ) CHRISTINE DeLOZIER, parent and ) next friend of L.T., a minor, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 15-124V ) Special Master Dorsey v. ) ECF ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) )

RESPONDENT’S JOINT STATUS REPORT IN RESPONSE TO RULING AWARDING PAIN AND SUFFERING DAMAGES (ECF NO. 170)

In the Special Master’s August 1, 2022 Ruling Awarding Pain and Suffering Damages

(“Ruling”), the Special Master noted that “the parties are to file a joint status report by

Wednesday, August 31, 2022, (1) converting the undersigned’s award of future pain and

suffering to its net present value, and (2) providing a statement of all damages in the manner that

the parties agree as the parties proposed in their July 18, 2022 joint status report.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Delozier v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2022).

Delozier v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Delozier v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(3)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a