Delost v. First Energy Corp.

894 N.E.2d 330, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1469
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 1, 2008
Docket2008-1329
StatusPublished

This text of 894 N.E.2d 330 (Delost v. First Energy Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Delost v. First Energy Corp., 894 N.E.2d 330, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1469 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

Mahoning App. No. 07 MA 194, 2008-0hio-3086. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 10 of the court of appeals’ Opinion filed June 17, 2008:

“Does a complaint seeking to prevent the removal of trees and vegetation within an easement owned by the utility company fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) or is it a pure contract case in which jurisdiction lies with the common pleas court?”

O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., would also hold the cause for the decision in 2008-0708, Corrigan v. Illuminating Co., Cuyahoga App. No. 89402,175 Ohio App.3d 360, 2008-Ohio-684.

The conflict case is Corrigan v. Illuminating Co., Cuyahoga App. No. 89402, 175 Ohio App.3d 360, 2008-Ohio-684.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Corrigan v. Illuminating Co.
887 N.E.2d 363 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
894 N.E.2d 330, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delost-v-first-energy-corp-ohio-2008.