Deloris Phillips v. Porshala Danyel Phillips and William Brent
Opinion
Order entered July 24, 2018
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00659-CV
DELORIS PHILLIPS, Appellant V.
PORSHALA DANYEL PHILLIPS AND WILLIAM BRENT, Appellees
On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DF-18-00541
ORDER
By order dated June 19, 2018, we directed Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to
file a supplemental clerk’s record containing certain documents, including the live pleadings, so that we could determine our jurisdiction over this appeal. A copy of that order was sent to the parties.
On June 22, 2018, appellant filed an “emergency expedited motion for interpretation/definition of Court’s term/language “live pleadings.” That motion is currently before us. Also before us are appellant’s July 23, 2018 (1) “request for preservation of any/all record/files/documents, etc.;” and (2) “emergency expedited motion for extension to file letter brief regarding jurisdiction matter.” We ORDER as follows.
We DENY the June 22nd motion for interpretation as moot because the supplemental clerk’s record has been filed and contains all the documents we requested. We DENY AS MOOT the July 23rd request for preservation because all records and documents filed in this appeal will be retained in accordance with applicable statutes and the Court’s record retention policy. We also GRANT the July 23rd extension motion and ORDER appellant to file the jurisdictional letter brief no later than August 6, 2018.
/s/ DAVID EVANS
JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Deloris Phillips v. Porshala Danyel Phillips and William Brent (Deloris Phillips v. Porshala Danyel Phillips and William Brent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.