Delores Ann Paysinger v. State
This text of Delores Ann Paysinger v. State (Delores Ann Paysinger v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _____________________ _____
09-17-00260-CR
__________________________
Delores Ann Paysinger
v.
The State of Texas
_________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 221st District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 15-05-05319-CR _________________________________________________________________
ORDER
The clerk’s record in the above styled and numbered cause was filed August
15, 2017. The reporter’s record was filed July 26, 2017. On November 18, 2017,
the Court granted a third extension of time to file Appellant’s brief, noting that the
extension was a “FINAL EXTENSION.” On December 8, 2017, the appellant’s
retained attorney, Elizabeth Alexander, was notified by written notice that although the brief of the appellant was due December 15, 2017, no brief had been filed. Our
notice stated that appellant’s brief must be filed by December 28, 2017 or this
Court would enter an order requiring the trial court to conduct a hearing to
determine why the brief has not been timely filed.
We abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court to conduct a
hearing at which a representative of the State, counsel for the appellant, and the
appellant shall be present in person. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). If the
appellant is not incarcerated, but fails to appear at the hearing after having been
notified to do so, or after reasonable attempts to notify him have been made, then
the trial court may enter a finding that appellant no longer desires to pursue the
appeal and forward said finding to this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(4). If
the appellant is present for the hearing, we direct the trial court to determine
whether or not appellant desires to pursue his appeal. If appellant desires to pursue
his appeal, we direct the trial court to determine why the brief of the appellant has
not been filed, why appellant’s counsel has not responded to late notices from this
Court, and whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. If the trial court
determines that retained counsel has abandoned the appeal, the trial court shall
determine whether appellant is indigent and whether counsel should be appointed
for the appeal. The record of the hearing, including any orders and findings of the trial court
judge, shall be sent to the appellate court for filing. The court reporter’s record and
the clerk’s record are to be filed on or before February 5, 2018.
ORDER ENTERED January 8, 2018.
PER CURIAM
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Delores Ann Paysinger v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delores-ann-paysinger-v-state-texapp-2018.