Delore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Delore v. State

19 So. 3d 442, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15200, 2009 WL 3235186

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 9, 2009

DocketNo. 5D08-4173

StatusPublished

This text of 19 So. 3d 442 (Delore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Delore v. State, 19 So. 3d 442, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15200, 2009 WL 3235186 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction for violation of probation based upon the condition 5 violation. However, as the State concedes, the Order of Revocation of Probation finds violations of other conditions for which no evidence was offered. We therefore re[443]*443mand this cause with instructions that the trial court strike all references to violations other than condition 5. Appellant need not be present.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

PALMER, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction for violation of probation based upon the condition 5 violation. However, as the State concedes, the Order of Revocation of Probation finds violations of other conditions for which no evidence was offered. We therefore re[443]*443mand this cause with instructions that the trial court strike all references to violations other than condition 5. Appellant need not be present.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

PALMER, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 So. 3d 442, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15200, 2009 WL 3235186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delore-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.