De'Lonta v. Angelone

Fourth Circuit

De'Lonta v. Angelone

11 F. App'x 144

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in De'Lonta v. Angelone. Read the opinion of the Court — 330 F.3d 630 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 24, 2001·No. 00-7732·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ophelia A. De’Lonta appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See De’Lonta v. Angelone, No. CA-99-642-7 (W.D.Va. Nov. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Ophelia A. De’Lonta appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See De’Lonta v. Angelone, No. CA-99-642-7 (W.D.Va. Nov. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

De'Lonta v. Angelone, 11 F. App'x 144 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

11 F. App'x 144 (De'Lonta v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related