DeLong v. Parmelee

248 P.3d 1042
Washington Supreme Court·Decided March 2, 2011·No. 85242-1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

248 P.3d 1042 (2011)
171 Wash.2d 1004

Lt. DELONG, Sgt. Ahrens, Sgt. McHaffie, Sgt. Bick, Sgt. Foulkes, Sgt. Banner, Sgt. Blankenship, Sgt. Mathieu, c/o Padgett, c/o Reams, c/o Judd, c/o Sandness, c/o Cornish, Respondents,
v.
Inmate PARMELEE, Allan DOC # 793782, Petitioner,
v.
Karen Brunson; Harold Clarke, Respondents.
T. DeLong, D. Ahrens, J. McHaffie, R. Foulkes, G. Banner, K. Banner, R. Blankenship, R. Padgett, N. Cornish, M. Dedman, S. Diimmel, G. Sandness, K. McKenney, E. Richardson, C. Riddle, P. Riddle, G. Olekas, Jr., L. LaVoie, S. Weed, G. Newton, J. Ernest, V. Attwood, S. Milstead, S. Toohey, H. Romero, C. Roening, D. Heaward, B. Dacus, L. Scroggins, D. Tracy, D. Winters, C. Nesbitt, R. O'Neel, C. Hatt, B. Hatt, B. Pederson, J. Smith, J. Mason, B. McGarvie, K. McTarsney, V. Adams, E. Leverington, J. Reyes, L. Shepherd, C. Ritter, Sr., S. Vogtnran, B. McLean, R. Christensen, M. Christensen, A. Moseley, C. Currington, T. Germeau, J. Palmer, J. Ivey, M. Erlenmeyer, M. Kerrone, J. Berry, J. Kuykendall, K. Russell, G. Epling, R. Leonard, J. Pearson, T. Perry, D. Weaver, K. Bowen, L. Wachendprf, C. Friesz, A. Sande, J. Wasankari, S. Henderson, G. Bellamy, J. Akin, F. Amsdill, R. Armacost, A. Boe, R. Case, J. Ides, D. Buchmann, M. Cummings, S. Cummings, V. Buttram, T. Jerome, W. Keys, S. Schwenker, H. Schwenker, B. Sprague, M. Swisher, R. Caulkins, S. Brown, D. Deleon Jr., D. Harkins, A. Miller, A. Davis, J. Wasnock, J. Kettel, J. Thayer, C. Bone, M. Sukert, R. Neiukoop, P. Blanton, A. Hess, R. Currington, D. Taber, D. Teachout, F. Teachout, L. Adamire, P. Headley, C. Towne, T. McNaughton, C. Lara, R. Bingham, G. Sukert, E. Reetz, C. Klock, D. Norman, R. Broussard, H. Mullen, R. Schimetz, N. Pence, H. Lee, R. Stevens and H. Nguyen, Respondents,
v.
Department of Corrections of the State of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Allan Parmelee, Petitioner.
The Washington State Department of Corrections, Respondent,
v.
Allan W. Parmelee, Petitioner.

No. 85242-1.

Supreme Court of Washington.

March 2, 2011.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices C. Johnson, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, considered at its March 1, 2011, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division Two for reconsideration in light of Seattle Times Co. v. Serko, 170 Wash.2d 581, 243 P.3d 919 (2010) and RCW 42.56.565.

For the Court

/s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

*1043

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DeLong v. Parmelee, 248 P.3d 1042 (Wash. 2011).

248 P.3d 1042 (DeLong v. Parmelee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seattle Times Co. v. Serko
243 P.3d 919 (Washington Supreme Court, 2010)
Seattle Times Co. v. Serko
170 Wash. 2d 581 (Washington Supreme Court, 2010)