DeLong v. Parmelee
This text of 248 P.3d 1042 (DeLong v. Parmelee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lt. DELONG, Sgt. Ahrens, Sgt. McHaffie, Sgt. Bick, Sgt. Foulkes, Sgt. Banner, Sgt. Blankenship, Sgt. Mathieu, c/o Padgett, c/o Reams, c/o Judd, c/o Sandness, c/o Cornish, Respondents,
v.
Inmate PARMELEE, Allan DOC # 793782, Petitioner,
v.
Karen Brunson; Harold Clarke, Respondents.
T. DeLong, D. Ahrens, J. McHaffie, R. Foulkes, G. Banner, K. Banner, R. Blankenship, R. Padgett, N. Cornish, M. Dedman, S. Diimmel, G. Sandness, K. McKenney, E. Richardson, C. Riddle, P. Riddle, G. Olekas, Jr., L. LaVoie, S. Weed, G. Newton, J. Ernest, V. Attwood, S. Milstead, S. Toohey, H. Romero, C. Roening, D. Heaward, B. Dacus, L. Scroggins, D. Tracy, D. Winters, C. Nesbitt, R. O'Neel, C. Hatt, B. Hatt, B. Pederson, J. Smith, J. Mason, B. McGarvie, K. McTarsney, V. Adams, E. Leverington, J. Reyes, L. Shepherd, C. Ritter, Sr., S. Vogtnran, B. McLean, R. Christensen, M. Christensen, A. Moseley, C. Currington, T. Germeau, J. Palmer, J. Ivey, M. Erlenmeyer, M. Kerrone, J. Berry, J. Kuykendall, K. Russell, G. Epling, R. Leonard, J. Pearson, T. Perry, D. Weaver, K. Bowen, L. Wachendprf, C. Friesz, A. Sande, J. Wasankari, S. Henderson, G. Bellamy, J. Akin, F. Amsdill, R. Armacost, A. Boe, R. Case, J. Ides, D. Buchmann, M. Cummings, S. Cummings, V. Buttram, T. Jerome, W. Keys, S. Schwenker, H. Schwenker, B. Sprague, M. Swisher, R. Caulkins, S. Brown, D. Deleon Jr., D. Harkins, A. Miller, A. Davis, J. Wasnock, J. Kettel, J. Thayer, C. Bone, M. Sukert, R. Neiukoop, P. Blanton, A. Hess, R. Currington, D. Taber, D. Teachout, F. Teachout, L. Adamire, P. Headley, C. Towne, T. McNaughton, C. Lara, R. Bingham, G. Sukert, E. Reetz, C. Klock, D. Norman, R. Broussard, H. Mullen, R. Schimetz, N. Pence, H. Lee, R. Stevens and H. Nguyen, Respondents,
v.
Department of Corrections of the State of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Allan Parmelee, Petitioner.
The Washington State Department of Corrections, Respondent,
v.
Allan W. Parmelee, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Washington.
ORDER
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices C. Johnson, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, considered at its March 1, 2011, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division Two for reconsideration in light of Seattle Times Co. v. Serko, 170 Wash.2d 581, 243 P.3d 919 (2010) and RCW 42.56.565.
For the Court
/s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE*1043
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 P.3d 1042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delong-v-parmelee-wash-2011.