Delong v. Curtis

42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 94
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 94 (Delong v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Delong v. Curtis, 42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 94 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1885).

Opinion

Hardin, P. J.:

Satisfaction of damages sustained by plaintiff by one tort feasor or trespasser was satisfaction as to all the wrong-doers. A release of-one, upon satisfaction by that one, operates as a discharge of all the wrong-doers. Mitchell v. Allen (25 Hun, 543) quodrates with [95]*95the case before us, and is an authority entitled to our following. (See, also, Barrett v. Third Am. R. R. Co., 45 N. Y., 628 ; Lovejoy v. Murray, 3 Wallace, 1, and cases cited in opinion.) One satisfaction for damages sustained by a wrongful act is all the plaintiff is entitled to receive. (Knickerbacker v. Colver, 8 Cowen, 111.)

Ve think the motion should be granted and judgment ordered for the defendants on the verdict, with costs.

BoaedmaN and Follett, JJ., concurred.

Motion granted and judgment ordered for defendants on the verdict, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barrett v. . the Third Avenue R.R. Co.
45 N.Y. 628 (New York Court of Appeals, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delong-v-curtis-nysupct-1885.